On 11/22/24 03:33, Bryan Gurney wrote:
I applied the above changes to my kernel tree and ran the below blktests:
# ./check nvme/033 nvme/034 nvme/035 nvme/036 nvme/037 nvme/039
nvme/033 => nvme0n1 (tr=loop) (create and connect to an NVMeOF target with a passthru controller) [not run]
/dev/nvme0n1 is a NVMe multipath device
nvme/034 => nvme0n1 (tr=loop) (run data verification fio job on an NVMeOF passthru controller) [not run]
/dev/nvme0n1 is a NVMe multipath device
nvme/035 => nvme0n1 (tr=loop) (run mkfs and data verification fio job on an NVMeOF passthru controller) [not run]
/dev/nvme0n1 is a NVMe multipath device
nvme/036 => nvme0n1 (tr=loop) (test NVMe reset command on an NVMeOF target with a passthru controller) [not run]
/dev/nvme0n1 is a NVMe multipath device
nvme/037 => nvme0n1 (tr=loop) (test deletion of NVMeOF passthru controllers immediately after setup) [not run]
/dev/nvme0n1 is a NVMe multipath device
nvme/039 => nvme0n1 (test error logging) [not run]
/dev/nvme0n1 is a NVMe multipath device
As we can see here, the above tests were skipped because the test detects
that the device (/dev/nvme0n1) is a multipath device. However, in fact,
the test device is NOT a multipath. So I think we need to update the above
tests. We may submit another patch to blktest and update above tests once
your changes are merged upstream.
Otherwise, changes look good to me:
Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>