Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM

[Kent Overstreet]

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 01:48:42PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:39:41AM GMT, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 02-09-24 04:52:49, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 10:41:31AM GMT, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > On Sun 01-09-24 21:35:30, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> [..]
> 
> Kent,
> 
> The Code of Conduct Committee received reports about your conduct in
> this email discussion.
> 
> Link to email where the violation took place:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/citv2v6f33hoidq75xd2spaqxf7nl5wbmmzma4wgmrwpoqidhj@k453tmq7vdrk
> 
> Our community works on trust and respect and has agreed to abide by the
> Code of Conduct:
> 
> Reference: https://docs.kernel.org/process/code-of-conduct.html
> 
> The code of Conduct Committee has determined that your written abuse
> of another community member required action on your part to repair the
> damage to the individual and the community. You took insufficient action
> to restore the community's faith in having otherwise productive technical
> discussions without the fear of personal attacks.
> 
> Following the Code of Conduct Interpretation process the TAB has approved
> has approved the following recommendation:
> 
> -- Restrict Kent Overstreet's participation in the kernel development
>    process during the Linux 6.13 kernel development cycle.
> 
>        - Scope: Decline all pull requests from Kent Overstreet during
>          the Linux 6.13 kernel development cycle.

Ok.

Just to be clear on what this is about though, I'm going to post
publically what I wrote Michal back in September.

This is about a CoC board that on the one hand, doesn't wish to follow
its own rules, and on the other - I can't even make sense of.