Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] cpuidle: Do not return from cpuidle_play_dead() on callback failures

From: Patryk Wlazlyn
Date: Mon Nov 25 2024 - 09:37:19 EST

Next message: Randy Dunlap: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/Documentation: Update algo in init_size description of boot protocol"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 9/9] objtool: Collect all annotations in objtool.h"
In reply to: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] cpuidle: Do not return from cpuidle_play_dead() on callback failures"
Next in thread: Patryk Wlazlyn: "[RFC PATCH v4 2/8] cpuidle: Change :enter_dead() driver callback return type to void"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> This one and the [2/2] are in the mainline as of today, no need to resend theM
ACK. Purely RFC. I just want to make sure we are all on the same page.
I'll rebase when we all agree on how to solve the problem.

Next message: Randy Dunlap: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/Documentation: Update algo in init_size description of boot protocol"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 9/9] objtool: Collect all annotations in objtool.h"
In reply to: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] cpuidle: Do not return from cpuidle_play_dead() on callback failures"
Next in thread: Patryk Wlazlyn: "[RFC PATCH v4 2/8] cpuidle: Change :enter_dead() driver callback return type to void"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]