Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] perf docs: Add documentation for --force-btf option

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 04:55:11PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> The --force-btf option is intended for debugging purposes and is
> currently undocumented. Add documentation for it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-trace.txt | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-trace.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-trace.txt
> index 6e0cc50bbc13..529081599cc7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-trace.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-trace.txt
> @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ the thread executes on the designated CPUs. Default is to monitor all CPUs.
>  	printing using the existing 'perf trace' syscall arg beautifiers to map integer
>  	arguments to strings (pid to comm, syscall id to syscall name, etc).
>  
> +--force-btf::
> +	Use btf_dump to pretty print syscall argument data, instead of using hand-crafted pretty printers.
> +

I think here we could expand a bit and explain that we want this for
testing the BTF code, and also mention that the hand-crafted pretty
printers know about integers -> strings, how to pretty print flags, etc
that BTF doesn't.

- Arnaldo

>  
>  PAGEFAULTS
>  ----------
> -- 
> 2.43.0