On 26/11/2024 13:51, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
J722S CSI BCDMA is similar to J721S2 CSI BCDMA and
supports both RX and TX channels. Add an entry for
J722S CSIRX BCDMA.
Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
process (neither too early nor over the limit):
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597
Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@xxxxxx>
---
V1->V2:
* Address review from Conor to add new J722S compatible
* J722S BCDMA is more similar to J721S2 in terms of RX/TX support,
add an entry alongside J721S2 instead of modifying AM62A.
V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241125083914.2934815-1-vaishnav.a@xxxxxx/
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
index 27b8e1636560..37832c71bd8e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
@@ -196,7 +196,9 @@ allOf:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
- const: ti,j721s2-dmss-bcdma-csi
+ enum:
+ - ti,j721s2-dmss-bcdma-csi
+ - ti,j722s-dmss-bcdma-csi
This compatible was never documented. There is no dependency here, no
cover letter explaining where is this compatible introduced.
Best regards,
Krzysztof