Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Large folios in block buffered IO path

[Bharata B Rao]

On 28-Nov-24 10:07 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On 28-Nov-24 9:52 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 09:31:50AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > > However a point of concern is that FIO bandwidth comes down drastically
> > > after the change.
> > >
> > >         default                inode_lock-fix
> > > rw=30%
> > > Instance 1    r=55.7GiB/s,w=23.9GiB/s        r=9616MiB/s,w=4121MiB/s
> > > Instance 2    r=38.5GiB/s,w=16.5GiB/s        r=8482MiB/s,w=3635MiB/s
> > > Instance 3    r=37.5GiB/s,w=16.1GiB/s        r=8609MiB/s,w=3690MiB/s
> > > Instance 4    r=37.4GiB/s,w=16.0GiB/s        r=8486MiB/s,w=3637MiB/s
> >
> > Something this dramatic usually only happens when you enable a debugging
> > option.  Can you recheck that you're running both A and B with the same
> > debugging options both compiled in, and enabled?
>
> It is the same kernel tree with and w/o Mateusz's inode_lock changes to 
> block/fops.c. I see the config remains same for both the builds.
>
> Let me get a run for both base and patched case w/o running perf lock 
> contention to check if that makes a difference.

Without perf lock contention

                default                         inode_lock-fix
rw=30%
Instance 1      r=54.6GiB/s,w=23.4GiB/s         r=11.4GiB/s,w=4992MiB/s
Instance 2      r=52.7GiB/s,w=22.6GiB/s         r=11.4GiB/s,w=4981MiB/s
Instance 3      r=53.3GiB/s,w=22.8GiB/s         r=12.7GiB/s,w=5575MiB/s
Instance 4      r=37.7GiB/s,w=16.2GiB/s         r=10.4GiB/s,w=4581MiB/s

> Regards,
> Bharata.