Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: Workaround TCON TOP conflict between DE0 and DE1

[Parthiban]

On 11/13/24 1:45 PM, John Watts wrote:
> It really seems like the code means mixers here.
True, I was wrong about my statement. But with A133, the case of independent DE
is unique, which I couldn't test yet.

> If my thoughts are correct, this would break use of mixer0 and mixer1 at the
> same time.
Agreed. But back to the original discussion about setting 0x20 to the port
register, it work fine in my end without that changes for A133 display pipeline
with LVDS. Not sure if the reason is independent DE.

Thanks,
Parthiban