Re: [PATCH 0/4] exportfs: add flag to allow marking export operations as only supporting file handles
From: Jeff Layton
Date: Sun Dec 01 2024 - 08:28:15 EST
On Sun, 2024-12-01 at 14:12 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Some filesystems like kernfs and pidfs support file handles as a
> convenience to enable the use of name_to_handle_at(2) and
> open_by_handle_at(2) but don't want to and cannot be reliably exported.
> Add a flag that allows them to mark their export operations accordingly
> and make NFS check for its presence.
>
> @Amir, I'll reorder the patches such that this series comes prior to the
> pidfs file handle series. Doing it that way will mean that there's never
> a state where pidfs supports file handles while also being exportable.
> It's probably not a big deal but it's definitely cleaner. It also means
> the last patch in this series to mark pidfs as non-exportable can be
> dropped. Instead pidfs export operations will be marked as
> non-exportable in the patch that they are added in.
>
> Thanks!
> Christian
>
> ---
> Christian Brauner (4):
> exportfs: add flag to indicate local file handles
> kernfs: restrict to local file handles
> ovl: restrict to exportable file handles
> pidfs: restrict to local file handles
>
> fs/kernfs/mount.c | 1 +
> fs/nfsd/export.c | 8 +++++++-
> fs/overlayfs/util.c | 7 ++++++-
> fs/pidfs.c | 1 +
> include/linux/exportfs.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 74e20c5946ab3f8ad959ea34f63f21e157d3ebae
> change-id: 20241201-work-exportfs-cd49bee773c5
>
I've been following the pidfs filehandle discussion and this is exactly
what I was thinking we needed: a way to explicitly label certain
fstypes as unexportable via nfsd.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>