Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Fix the wrong format specifier
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Dec 02 2024 - 05:00:56 EST
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 12:11:26PM +0800, zhangjiao2 wrote:
> From: zhang jiao <zhangjiao2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The format specifier of "unsigned long" in printf()
> should be "%lu", not "%ld".
Your subject is wrong, also, who cares? Why did you write this patch?
> Signed-off-by: zhang jiao <zhangjiao2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/objtool/check.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
> index 4ce176ad411f..9c36bb519cf3 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> @@ -4934,10 +4934,10 @@ int check(struct objtool_file *file)
> disas_warned_funcs(file);
>
> if (opts.stats) {
> - printf("nr_insns_visited: %ld\n", nr_insns_visited);
> - printf("nr_cfi: %ld\n", nr_cfi);
> - printf("nr_cfi_reused: %ld\n", nr_cfi_reused);
> - printf("nr_cfi_cache: %ld\n", nr_cfi_cache);
> + printf("nr_insns_visited: %lu\n", nr_insns_visited);
> + printf("nr_cfi: %lu\n", nr_cfi);
> + printf("nr_cfi_reused: %lu\n", nr_cfi_reused);
> + printf("nr_cfi_cache: %lu\n", nr_cfi_cache);
> }
>
> out:
> --
> 2.33.0
>
>
>