Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: qcom-ep: Mark BAR0/BAR2 as 64bit BARs and BAR1/BAR3 as RESERVED

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 06:28:45PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 01:55:37PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 02:54:12PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > On all Qcom endpoint SoCs, BAR0/BAR2 are 64bit BARs by default
> > > and software cannot change the type. So mark the those BARs as
> > > 64bit BARs and also mark the successive BAR1/BAR3 as RESERVED
> > > BARs so that the EPF drivers cannot use them.
> ...

> > > Cc: stable+noautosel@xxxxxxxxxx # depends on patch introducing only_64bit flag
> > 
> > If stable maintainers need to act on this, do they need to search for
> > the patch introducing only_64bit flag?  That seems onerous; is there a
> > SHA1 that would make it easier?
> 
> But that's not the point of having noautosel tag, AFAIK.
> 
> Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst clearly says that this
> tag is to be used when we do not want the stable team to backport
> the commit due to a missing dependency.
> ...

> Here I did not intend to backport this change with commit adding
> only_64bit flag because, I'm not sure if that dependency alone would
> be sufficient. If someone really cares about backporting this
> change, then they should figure out the dependencies, test the
> functionality and then ask the stable team.

Oh, sorry, I was assuming "stable+noautosel@xxxxxxxxxx" was a hint for
stable maintainers to pick this up, not a hint to ignore it.
Eventually this meaning will sink in.

Bjorn