Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: Cleaned up coding style and parameters

[Aaro Koskinen]

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 08:35:47AM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> The sleeps are not shorter, instead possibly longer. I do not think
> that is an issue, AFAIK the idea with sleep range is to bundle wakeups
> and reduce power consumption.

msleep(1) is jiffie-based and can take up to 20 ms. If you replace
it with more precise usleep then polling is more frequent (more
wakeups) 

A.