Re: [PATCH 03/14] iio: adc: rzg2l_adc: Simplify the runtime PM code

[Paul Barker]

Hi Claudiu,

On 03/12/2024 11:13, Claudiu wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> All Renesas SoCs using the rzg2l_adc driver manage ADC clocks through PM
> domains. Calling pm_runtime_{resume_and_get, put_sync}() implicitly sets
> the state of the clocks. As a result, the code in the rzg2l_adc driver that
> explicitly manages ADC clocks can be removed, leading to simpler and
> cleaner implementation.
> 
> Additionally, replace the use of rzg2l_adc_set_power() with direct PM
> runtime API calls to further simplify and clean up the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/rzg2l_adc.c | 100 ++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rzg2l_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/rzg2l_adc.c
> index 7039949a7554..a17690ecbdc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/rzg2l_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rzg2l_adc.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> -#include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/completion.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> @@ -69,8 +68,6 @@ struct rzg2l_adc_data {
>  
>  struct rzg2l_adc {
>  	void __iomem *base;
> -	struct clk *pclk;
> -	struct clk *adclk;
>  	struct reset_control *presetn;
>  	struct reset_control *adrstn;
>  	struct completion completion;
> @@ -188,29 +185,18 @@ static int rzg2l_adc_conversion_setup(struct rzg2l_adc *adc, u8 ch)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int rzg2l_adc_set_power(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool on)
> -{
> -	struct device *dev = indio_dev->dev.parent;
> -
> -	if (on)
> -		return pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> -
> -	return pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> -}
> -
>  static int rzg2l_adc_conversion(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct rzg2l_adc *adc, u8 ch)
>  {
> +	struct device *dev = indio_dev->dev.parent;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = rzg2l_adc_set_power(indio_dev, true);
> +	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;

Should we check (ret < 0) here instead of just (ret)? According to the
docs [1], pm_runtime_resume_and_get() can return 1 if the device is
already active.

[1]: https://docs.kernel.org/power/runtime_pm.html#runtime-pm-device-helper-functions

Thanks,

-- 
Paul Barker

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature