Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] rust: xarray: Add an abstraction for XArray

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 4:00 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I prefer to be explicit, unless there's guidance on this somewhere?

I like explicitness in general, but do you think there is an advantage
for things in the prelude?

I am asking because I am considering adding more things there, e.g. I
have a series to be sent to add the `ffi::c_*` types -- having things
like those in the prelude reduces the noise in imports that everyone
knows about (and that nobody should be tempted to alias anyway), makes
things more consistent (because then every use is unqualified vs. the
mix we have now) and generally the code looks easier to read to focus
on the other things that may be less common.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel