Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel: int0002_vgpio: use gpiochip_get_data

[Hans de Goede]

Hi Rosen,

Thank you for your patch.

On 4-Dec-24 12:35 AM, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Instead of using container_of, we can pass the pointer to
> gpiochip_add_data and use it.

Yes that is possible, but why? What is the advantage
of doing this?

Given that the struct gpio_chip is the first member
of struct int0002_data it is actually free as it
turns into a no-op.

Where as gpiochip_get_data() is a non inline helper,
so your replacing a no-op with a function call here
I don't see how this makes things better?

Regards,

Hans



> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx>



> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
> index 0cc80603a8a9..7ce0774b3896 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void int0002_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
>  static int int0002_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>  {
>  	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> -	struct int0002_data *int0002 = container_of(chip, struct int0002_data, chip);
> +	struct int0002_data *int0002 = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Applying of the wakeup flag to our parent IRQ is delayed till system
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
>  	girq->handler = handle_edge_irq;
>  
> -	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, chip, NULL);
> +	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, chip, int0002);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Error adding gpio chip: %d\n", ret);
>  		return ret;