Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched_ext: Introduce per-NUMA idle cpumasks

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 09:41:43AM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
...
> I like the idea of introducing a flag. The default should be flattened
> cpumask, so everything remains the same, and if a scheduler explicitly
> enables SCX_OPS_NUMA_IDLE_MASK (suggestions for the name?) we can switch
> to the NUMA-aware idle logic.

I think it generally works better to use "node" instead of "numa" for these
interfaces. That's more common and matches the interface functions that need
to be used and exposed, so maybe sth like SCX_OPS_BUILTIN_IDLE_PER_NODE or
SCX_OPS_NODE_BUILTIN_IDLE?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun