Re: [PATCH v1] hugetlb: support FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE

[Guillaume Morin]

On 05 Dec  2:42, Guillaume Morin wrote:
>
> On 05 Dec  8:39, kernel test robot wrote:
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
> >    mm/gup.c: In function 'can_follow_write_pud':
> > >> mm/gup.c:665:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_soft_dirty'; did you mean 'pmd_soft_dirty'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >      665 |         return !vma_soft_dirty_enabled(vma) || pud_soft_dirty(pud);
> >          |                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >          |                                                pmd_soft_dirty
> >    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> David, how do you recommend I deal with this?
> 
> There is no prototype for pud_soft_dirty() in include/linux/pgtable.h
> if CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY is not set. Should I just add one?

I am going to respin v3 with that. Let me know if you think it makes
sense or you think it should be fixed some other way

-- 
Guillaume Morin <guillaume@xxxxxxxxxxx>