Re: [PATCH v6 01/18] tools: Add gendwarfksyms

[Masahiro Yamada]

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:26 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:50:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 8:30 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 08:42:22PM +0000, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > > Add a basic DWARF parser, which uses libdw to traverse the debugging
> > > > information in an object file and looks for functions and variables.
> > > > In follow-up patches, this will be expanded to produce symbol versions
> > > > for CONFIG_MODVERSIONS from DWARF.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  kernel/module/Kconfig                 |   8 ++
> > > >  scripts/Makefile                      |   1 +
> > > >  scripts/gendwarfksyms/.gitignore      |   2 +
> > >
> > > This doesn't add scripts/gendwarfksyms to MAINTAINERS
> > > but then again   scripts/genksyms/ is not there either
> > > but it does got to Masahiro.
> >
> > scripts/genksyms/ is a very old tool with no maintainer.
> >
> > It defaults to the maintainer of the scripts/ directory (i.e. me)
> >
> > > Masahiro, should we just add both to KERNEL BUILD and add
> > > Sami as a Reviewer to help with gendwarfksyms?
> >
> > I think it is better to have a separate entry for
> >
> > F:  scripts/gendwarfksyms/
> >
> > with Sami as the maintainer.
>
> OK do you want this and the extended modversions to go through your tree
> or modules tree?
>
>   Luis


I guess I can pick up them.

I was just thinking about a possibility to
make this (and the other one) less worse.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada