Re: [PATCH 0/5] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Reuse and refactor code

[Dhananjay Ugwekar]

Hello Mario,

On 12/4/2024 10:37 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 12/4/2024 08:48, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>> Use static calls to avoid frequent MSR/shared memory system checks.
>>
>> Reuse existing functions amd_pstate_update_perf() and
>> amd_pstate_set_epp() instead of duplicating code.
>>
>> Remove an unnecessary check for active mode in online and offline
>> functions.
>>
>> Eliminate a redundant function amd_pstate_epp_offline().
>>
>> Dhananjay Ugwekar (5):
>>    cpufreq/amd-pstate: Convert the amd_pstate_get/set_epp() to static
>>      calls
>>    cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move the invocation of amd_pstate_update_perf()
>>    cpufreq/amd-pstate: Refactor amd_pstate_epp_reenable() and
>>      amd_pstate_epp_offline()
>>    cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the cppc_state check in offline/online
>>      functions
>>    cpufreq/amd-pstate: Merge amd_pstate_epp_cpu_offline() and
>>      amd_pstate_epp_offline()
>>
>>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>>   1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> For the patches not already reviewed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>

Thanks! 

> 
> I'll add this to superm1/bleeding-edge.

There is a small warning in the 3rd patch, how do you suggest we fix that, 
should I post a new version or you'll modify the patch at your end?

   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c: In function 'amd_pstate_epp_offline':
>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c:1664:13: warning: variable 'value' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
    1664 |         u64 value;
         |             ^~~~~

Regards,
Dhananjay

> 
> I have another series that I will build on top of it as well.