Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] acpi/ghes: better name GHES memory error function
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Date: Thu Dec 05 2024 - 03:19:24 EST
Em Wed, 4 Dec 2024 17:40:25 +0100
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 08:41:18 +0100
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The current function used to generate GHES data is specific for
> > memory errors. Give a better name for it, as we now have a generic
> > function as well.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> not that it matters but for FYI
> Sign off of author goes 1st and then after it other tags
> that were added later
Yes, that's what I usually do, when I'm using my developer's hat.
Placing reviews before SoB is what I do with my maintainer's hat
at the Kernel :-)
I'll address it for the next (and hopefully final) version.
>
> > ---
> > hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c | 2 +-
> > hw/acpi/ghes.c | 2 +-
> > include/hw/acpi/ghes.h | 4 ++--
> > target/arm/kvm.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c b/hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c
> > index 2b64cbd2819a..7cec1812dad9 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/ghes-stub.c
> > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> > #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> > #include "hw/acpi/ghes.h"
> >
> > -int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> > +int acpi_ghes_memory_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> > {
> > return -1;
> > }
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/ghes.c b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> > index 4b5332f8c667..414a4a1ee00e 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> > @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ void ghes_record_cper_errors(const void *cper, size_t len,
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > -int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> > +int acpi_ghes_memory_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
> > {
> > /* Memory Error Section Type */
> > const uint8_t guid[] =
> > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h b/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> > index 8859346af51a..21666a4bcc8b 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> > @@ -74,15 +74,15 @@ void acpi_build_hest(GArray *table_data, GArray *hardware_errors,
> > const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id);
> > void acpi_ghes_add_fw_cfg(AcpiGhesState *vms, FWCfgState *s,
> > GArray *hardware_errors);
> > +int acpi_ghes_memory_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t error_physical_addr);
> > void ghes_record_cper_errors(const void *cper, size_t len,
> > uint16_t source_id, Error **errp);
> > -int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t error_physical_addr);
> >
> > /**
> > * acpi_ghes_present: Report whether ACPI GHES table is present
> > *
> > * Returns: true if the system has an ACPI GHES table and it is
> > - * safe to call acpi_ghes_record_errors() to record a memory error.
> > + * safe to call acpi_ghes_memory_errors() to record a memory error.
> > */
> > bool acpi_ghes_present(void);
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c
> > index 7b6812c0de2e..b4260467f8b9 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target/arm/kvm.c
> > @@ -2387,7 +2387,7 @@ void kvm_arch_on_sigbus_vcpu(CPUState *c, int code, void *addr)
> > */
> > if (code == BUS_MCEERR_AR) {
> > kvm_cpu_synchronize_state(c);
> > - if (!acpi_ghes_record_errors(ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_SEA, paddr)) {
> > + if (!acpi_ghes_memory_errors(ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_SEA, paddr)) {
> > kvm_inject_arm_sea(c);
> > } else {
> > error_report("failed to record the error");
>
Thanks,
Mauro