Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] dt-bindings: iio: accel: add interrupt-names
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Thu Dec 05 2024 - 12:54:45 EST
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 05:13:39PM +0000, Lothar Rubusch wrote:
> Add interrupt-names INT1 and INT2 for the two interrupt lines of the
> sensor. Only one line will be connected for incoming events. The driver
> needs to be configured accordingly. If no interrupt line is set up, the
> sensor will still measure, but no events are possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> index 280ed479ef5..67e2c029a6c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ properties:
> interrupts:
> maxItems: 1
>
> + interrupt-names:
> + description: Use either INT1 or INT2 for events, or ignore events.
> + items:
> + - enum: [INT1, INT2]
The description for this ", or ignore events" does not make sense. Just
drop it, it's clear what happens if you don't provide interrupts.
However, interrupts is a required property but interrupt-names is not.
Seems rather pointless not making interrupt-names a required property
(in the binding!) since if you only add interrupts and not
interrupt-names you can't even use the interrupt as you do not know
whether or not it is INT1 or INT2?
> +
> required:
> - compatible
> - reg
> @@ -61,6 +66,7 @@ examples:
> reg = <0x2a>;
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-names = "INT1";
> };
> };
> - |
> @@ -79,5 +85,6 @@ examples:
> spi-cpha;
> interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
> interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-names = "INT2";
> };
> };
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature