Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Add support for I2C_RX_ID
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Thu Dec 05 2024 - 14:37:17 EST
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 03:59:58PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 05/12/2024 10:31, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 01:05:21PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
...
> > > #define MHZ(v) ((u32)((v) * 1000000U))
> >
> > Missed HZ_PER_MHZ from previous patch?
>
> Yes, and no. I did leave the MHZ uses on purpose. I think the use of
> HZ_PER_MHZ was fine in the calculations, but when having table-ish use of
> MHZ, with hardcoded numbers, I found the MHZ() macro much nicer to read:
>
> case MHZ(1200):
>
> vs.
> case 1200 * HZ_PER_MHZ:
Had I talked about tables? :-)
I was only commented the calculations.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko