Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, rmap: handle anon_vma_fork() NULL check inline

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Mon Dec 09 2024 - 08:37:53 EST

Next message: Jann Horn: "Re: [syzbot] [mm?] general protection fault in find_mergeable_anon_vma"
Previous message: Ilpo Järvinen: "Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] x86/amd_nb: Move SMN access code to a new amd_node driver"
In reply to: Jinjie Ruan: "[PATCH 2/2] mm, rmap: handle anon_vma_fork() NULL check inline"
Next in thread: Jinjie Ruan: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, rmap: handle anon_vma_fork() NULL check inline"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:25:49PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Check the anon_vma of pvma inline so we can avoid the function call
> overhead if the anon_vma is NULL.

This really gets you 1% perf improvement? On what hardware?

Next message: Jann Horn: "Re: [syzbot] [mm?] general protection fault in find_mergeable_anon_vma"
Previous message: Ilpo Järvinen: "Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] x86/amd_nb: Move SMN access code to a new amd_node driver"
In reply to: Jinjie Ruan: "[PATCH 2/2] mm, rmap: handle anon_vma_fork() NULL check inline"
Next in thread: Jinjie Ruan: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, rmap: handle anon_vma_fork() NULL check inline"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]