Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 2/2] mm/memory_hotplug: don't use __GFP_HARDWALL when migrating pages via memory offlining
From: Vlastimil Babka
Date: Mon Dec 09 2024 - 12:47:46 EST
On 12/5/24 10:05, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We'll migrate pages allocated by other context; respecting the cpuset of
> the memory offlining context when allocating a migration target does not
> make sense.
>
> Drop the __GFP_HARDWALL by using GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Note that in an ideal world, migration code could figure out the cpuset
> of the original context and take that into consideration.
>
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Thanks!
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 5f497ccf473d..3b6f93962481 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1838,7 +1838,7 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> nodemask_t nmask = node_states[N_MEMORY];
> struct migration_target_control mtc = {
> .nmask = &nmask,
> - .gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
> + .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
> .reason = MR_MEMORY_HOTPLUG,
> };
> int ret;