Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] x86: Fix build regression with CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP enabled
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon Dec 09 2024 - 17:22:52 EST
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:52:57PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Already had to. The question is whether I'm content to follow the existing
> precedent and put the ifdef around just the two lines of code which don't
> compile otherwise, or whether I want to clean it up and elide the whole of
> the unreachable code paths.
I'd say, let's try it and see how it looks and whether the code gets more
readable this way but let's get rid of the yak hair first, shall we?
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette