Re: [PATCH net-next v1 07/11] net: usb: lan78xx: Use ETIMEDOUT instead of ETIME in lan78xx_stop_hw

[Andrew Lunn]

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 02:07:47PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Update `lan78xx_stop_hw` to return `-ETIMEDOUT` instead of `-ETIME` when
> a timeout occurs. While `-ETIME` indicates a general timer expiration,
> `-ETIMEDOUT` is more commonly used for signaling operation timeouts and
> provides better consistency with standard error handling in the driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> index 2966f7e63617..c66e404f51ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> @@ -844,9 +844,7 @@ static int lan78xx_stop_hw(struct lan78xx_net *dev, u32 reg, u32 hw_enabled,
>  		} while (!stopped && !time_after(jiffies, timeout));
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = stopped ? 0 : -ETIME;
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return stopped ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;

I've not looked at the call stack, but tx_complete() and rx_complete()
specifically looks for ETIME. Do they need to change as well?

	Andrew