Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Use CPUFREQ_POLICY_UNKNOWN

From: Mario Limonciello
Date: Wed Dec 11 2024 - 11:37:56 EST


On 12/11/2024 06:26, Christian Loehle wrote:
epp_policy uses the same values as cpufreq_policy.policy and resets
to CPUFREQ_POLICY_UNKNOWN during offlining. Be consistent about
it and initialize to CPUFREQ_POLICY_UNKNOWN instead of 0, too.

No functional change intended.

Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
Cc: <gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
index d7630bab2516..546e69cbdf76 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return -ENOMEM;
cpudata->cpu = policy->cpu;
- cpudata->epp_policy = 0;
+ cpudata->epp_policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_UNKNOWN;
ret = amd_pstate_init_perf(cpudata);
if (ret)

Hi,

Thanks for the patch. In this case it's actually not needed though. Some of the in-flight content for 6.14 drops that variable. This is on the superm1/linux.git bleeding-edge branch (which content will promote to superm1/linux.git linux-next branch soon and eventually come to linux-pm).

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/superm1/linux.git/commit/?h=bleeding-edge&id=b8321230569dc17852a7f7adc7715ad07538cbeb