Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: KVM: Add test case for MMIO during vectoring

[Sean Christopherson]

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, Ivan Orlov wrote:
> Extend the 'set_memory_region_test' with a test case which covers the
> MMIO during vectoring error handling. The test case
> 
> 1) Sets an IDT descriptor base to point to an MMIO address
> 2) Generates a #GP in the guest
> 3) Verifies that we got a correct exit reason and suberror code
> 4) Verifies that we got a corrent reported GPA in internal.data[3]
> 
> Also, add a definition of non-canonical address to processor.h
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <iorlov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V1 -> V2:
> - Get rid of pronouns, redundant comments and incorrect wording
> - Define noncanonical address in processor.h
> - Fix indentation and wrap lines at 80 columns
> 
>  .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h  |  2 +
>  .../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c    | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> index 1a60c99b5833..997df5003edb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> @@ -1165,6 +1165,8 @@ void vm_install_exception_handler(struct kvm_vm *vm, int vector,
>  /* If a toddler were to say "abracadabra". */
>  #define KVM_EXCEPTION_MAGIC 0xabacadabaULL
>  
> +#define NONCANONICAL 0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaull

Uber nit, I much prefer to place this definition at the top of the header.  More
specifically, it needs to not be in the middle of the selftest's exception fixup
code.

> +
>  /*
>   * KVM selftest exception fixup uses registers to coordinate with the exception
>   * handler, versus the kernel's in-memory tables and KVM-Unit-Tests's in-memory
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
> index a1c53cc854a5..d65a9f20aa1a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
> @@ -553,6 +553,56 @@ static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void)
>  	close(memfd);
>  	kvm_vm_free(vm);
>  }
> +
> +static void guest_code_mmio_during_vectoring(void)
> +{
> +	const struct desc_ptr idt_desc = {
> +		.address = MEM_REGION_GPA,
> +		.size = 0xFFF,
> +	};
> +
> +	set_idt(&idt_desc);
> +
> +	/* Generate a #GP by dereferencing a non-canonical address */
> +	*((uint8_t *)NONCANONICAL) = 0x1;

Now I'm curious what happens if this uses vcpu_arch_put_guest(), i.e. if the
test forces KVM to emulate the write.

No action needed, the test is a-ok as-is.  I'm really just curious :-)