Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/bugs: Add SRSO_USER_KERNEL_NO support

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:53:15PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> The printk makes sense when it's actually a fallback from
> "spec_rstack_overflow=safe-ret"

Well, it kinda is as safe-ret is the default and we're falling back from it...

> but if nothing was specified on the cmdline, it's the default rather than
> a fallback.  In which case I think the printk would be confusing.

... but as I said, I'm not hung on that printk - zapped it is.

Btw, Sean, how should we merge this?

Should I take it all through tip and give you an immutable branch?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette