Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: mdio: Add RTL9300 MDIO driver

[Andrew Lunn]

> +	/* get_phy_c45_ids() will stop the mdio bus scan if we return an error
> +	 * here. So even though the SMI controller indicates an error for an
> +	 * absent device don't proagate it here.
> +	 */
> +	//if (val & BIT(25)) {
> +	//	err = -ENODEV;
> +	//	return err;
> +	//}

Please don't leave committed out code. It should either be needed, and
uncommented, or deleted.

> +static int realtek_mdiobus_init(struct realtek_mdio_priv *priv)
> +{
> +	u32 port_addr[5] = { };
> +	u32 poll_sel[2] = { 0, 0 };
> +	u32 glb_ctrl_mask = 0, glb_ctrl_val = 0;
> +	int i, err;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_PORTS; i++) {
> +		int pos;
> +
> +		if (priv->smi_bus[i] > 3)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		pos = (i % 6) * 5;
> +		port_addr[i / 6] |=  priv->smi_addr[i] << pos;
> +
> +		pos = (i % 16) * 2;
> +		poll_sel[i / 16] |= priv->smi_bus[i] << pos;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_SMI_BUSSES; i++) {
> +		if (priv->smi_bus_isc45[i]) {
> +			glb_ctrl_mask |= GLB_CTRL_INTF_SEL(i);
> +			glb_ctrl_val |= GLB_CTRL_INTF_SEL(i);
> +		}
> +	}

Please could you add some comments because i don't understand this at
all.

> +
> +	err = regmap_bulk_write(priv->regmap, priv->reg_base + SMI_PORT0_5_ADDR_CTRL,
> +				port_addr, 5);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	err = regmap_bulk_write(priv->regmap, priv->reg_base + SMI_PORT0_15_POLLING_SEL,
> +				poll_sel, 2);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	err = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, priv->reg_base + SMI_GLB_CTRL,
> +				 glb_ctrl_mask, glb_ctrl_val);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int realtek_mdiobus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct realtek_mdio_priv *priv;
> +	struct fwnode_handle *child;
> +	struct mii_bus *bus;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc_size(dev, sizeof(*priv));
> +	if (!bus)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	bus->name = "Reaktek Switch MDIO Bus";
> +	bus->read_c45 = realtek_mdio_read_c45;
> +	bus->write_c45 =  realtek_mdio_write_c45;
> +	bus->parent = dev;
> +	priv = bus->priv;
> +
> +	priv->regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->regmap);
> +
> +	err = device_property_read_u32(dev, "reg", &priv->reg_base);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s", dev_name(dev));
> +
> +	device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
> +		u32 pn, smi_addr[2];
> +
> +		err = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &pn);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		if (pn > MAX_PORTS)
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "illegal port number %d\n", pn);
> +
> +		err = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(child, "realtek,smi-address", smi_addr, 2);
> +		if (err) {
> +			smi_addr[0] = 0;
> +			smi_addr[1] = pn;
> +		}

Would returning -EINVAL be better here, since it indicates a bug in
the device tree?

> +
> +		if (fwnode_device_is_compatible(child, "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"))
> +			priv->smi_bus_isc45[smi_addr[0]] = true;

If it is not C45 then what? I don't see any support for C22.

	Andrew