On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 12:01, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Vincent,
Thank you for reviewing the patch.
On 12/12/2024 3:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 19:58, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Only set sg_overloaded when computing sg_lb_stats() at the highest sched
domain since rd->overloaded status is updated only when load balancing
at the highest domain. While at it, move setting of sg_overloaded below
idle_cpu() check since an idle CPU can never be overloaded.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ec2a79c8d0e7..3f36805ecdca 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10358,9 +10358,6 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
nr_running = rq->nr_running;
sgs->sum_nr_running += nr_running;
- if (nr_running > 1)
- *sg_overloaded = 1;
-
if (cpu_overutilized(i))
*sg_overutilized = 1;
@@ -10373,6 +10370,10 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
continue;
}
+ /* Overload indicator is only updated at root domain */
+ if (!env->sd->parent && nr_running > 1)
nit: may be worth checking local variable 1st which should be cheaper
than env->sd->parent
What are your thoughts on passing NULL for "sg_overloaded" when calling
update_sg_lb_stats() at non-root domains? Would it be equally cheap to
do:
if (sg_overloaded && nr_running > 1)
*sg_overloaded = 1;
you will have to test it twice as it is also set for misfit task
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you.
+ *sg_overloaded = 1;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
/* Only fbq_classify_group() uses this to classify NUMA groups */
if (sd_flags & SD_NUMA) {
--
2.34.1
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek