Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix an assertion failure related to squota feature.

From: Julian Sun
Date: Mon Dec 16 2024 - 07:53:08 EST


Friendly ping...
[+cc Boris]

Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx> 于2024年12月11日周三 19:13写道:
>
> With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion
> failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature.
>
> [ 5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365
> [ 5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365!
> [ 5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b #146
> [ 5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> [ 5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0
> [ 5.604303] <TASK>
> [ 5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0
> [ 5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70
> [ 5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0
> [ 5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30
> [ 5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0
> [ 5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0
> [ 5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760
> [ 5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710
> [ 5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0
> [ 5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100
> [ 5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60
> [ 5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0
> [ 5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100
> [ 5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0
> [ 5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150
>
> The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproduer:
> root@q:linux# cat repro.sh
> set -e
>
> mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb > /dev/null
> mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs
> btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs
> umount /mnt/btrfs
> mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs
>
> The root cause of this issue is as follows:
> When simple quota is enabled, the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA
> flag is set after btrfs_commit_transaction(), whereas the
> BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE flag is set before btrfs_commit_transaction(),
> which led to the first flag not being flushed to disk, and the second
> flag is successfully flushed. Finally causes this assertion failure
> after umount && mount again.
>
> To resolve this issue, the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag
> is set immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE.
> This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same
> transaction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> index a6f92836c9b1..f9b214992212 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> @@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@ int btrfs_quota_enable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> fs_info->qgroup_flags = BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_ON;
> if (simple) {
> fs_info->qgroup_flags |= BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE;
> + btrfs_set_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA);
> btrfs_set_qgroup_status_enable_gen(leaf, ptr, trans->transid);
> } else {
> fs_info->qgroup_flags |= BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_INCONSISTENT;
> @@ -1254,8 +1255,6 @@ int btrfs_quota_enable(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
> fs_info->quota_root = quota_root;
> set_bit(BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED, &fs_info->flags);
> - if (simple)
> - btrfs_set_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA);
> spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock);
>
> /* Skip rescan for simple qgroups. */
> --
> 2.39.5
>


--
Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx>