Re: [PATCH] igc: Return early when failing to read EECD register

From: Lifshits, Vitaly
Date: Tue Dec 17 2024 - 02:00:58 EST




On 12/17/2024 3:23 AM, Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 06:53:10AM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
On 12/16/24 06:14, Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) wrote:
When booting with a dock connected, the igc driver can get stuck for ~40
seconds if PCIe link is lost during initialization.

This happens because the driver access device after EECD register reads
return all F's, indicating failed reads. Consequently, hw->hw_addr is set
to NULL, which impacts subsequent rd32() reads. This leads to the driver
hanging in igc_get_hw_semaphore_i225(), as the invalid hw->hw_addr
prevents retrieving the expected value.

Than you very much for the patch and the analysis!


To address this, a validation check is added for the EECD register read
result. If all F's are returned, indicating PCIe link loss, the driver
will return -ENXIO immediately. This avoids the 40-second hang and

It is not clear from the patch what part of the driver will return
-ENXIO, you have put -ENODEV in the patch, but it's ignored anyway.
I was thinking of using -ENODEV or -ENXIO, and I forgot to generate
the patch again after I changed it to -ENXIO in the commit message.
I'll fix this in v2.

significantly improves boot time when using a dock with an igc NIC.

[ 0.911913] igc 0000:70:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
[ 0.912386] igc 0000:70:00.0: PTM enabled, 4ns granularity
[ 1.571098] igc 0000:70:00.0 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): PCIe link lost, device now detached
[ 43.449095] igc_get_hw_semaphore_i225: igc 0000:70:00.0 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Driver can't access device - SMBI bit is set.
[ 43.449186] igc 0000:70:00.0: probe with driver igc failed with error -13
[ 46.345701] igc 0000:70:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
[ 46.345777] igc 0000:70:00.0: PTM enabled, 4ns granularity


Would be best if you could also attach the sequence after your fix.
Sure

Please add a Fixes: tag.
I'm not sure which commit should I add Fixes to.

Please make [PATCH iwl-net] as a subject prefix. Please CC Vitaly.
igc is an ethernet driver, should I also add iwl-net tag?

(But please also wait a day prior to sending v2 for more feedback).

Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c
index 9fae8bdec2a7..54ce60280765 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_base.c
@@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ static s32 igc_init_nvm_params_base(struct igc_hw *hw)

This function is used only in igc_get_invariants_base(), which ignores
the return value you have added. I would expect it to propagate instead.
You are right, looks like the patch fixes the issue accidentally.
Return earlier in igc_get_invariants_base() skipping the rest of the
settings. The part impacts the behavior is nvm->word_size will be 0.
And then in igc_get_hw_semaphore_i225() the timeout value will become
1. So that we won't hang for 40 seconds to wait for the timeout.

This patch is not perfect, I need to figure out another way to address
the issue better.
Please let me know if you got any ideas.
Thanks.


I like your approach to this bug fix.

However, it seems that without another change in igc_get_invariants_base the failure won't cause an early return with an error status.
You will need to add something like:
ret_val = igc_init_nvm_params_base(hw);
+ if (ret_val)
+ return -ENODEV;
switch (hw->mac.type) {



u32 eecd = rd32(IGC_EECD);
u16 size;
+ /* failed to read reg and got all F's */
+ if (!(~eecd))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
size = FIELD_GET(IGC_EECD_SIZE_EX_MASK, eecd);
/* Added to a constant, "size" becomes the left-shift value