Re: [PATCH 4/5] remoteproc: k3-r5: Use devm_ioremap_wc() helper

From: Beleswar Prasad Padhi
Date: Wed Dec 18 2024 - 03:23:40 EST



On 17/12/24 21:33, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 12/4/24 5:11 AM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
Use a device lifecycle managed ioremap helper function. This helps
prevent mistakes like unmapping out of order in cleanup functions and
forgetting to unmap on all error paths.

Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@xxxxxx>
---
  drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 40 +++++-------------------
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
index 2966cb210403..1a7681502f62 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -1004,17 +1004,13 @@ static int k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
      /* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */
      for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) {
          rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1);
-        if (!rmem_np) {
-            ret = -EINVAL;
-            goto unmap_rmem;
-        }
+        if (!rmem_np)
+            return -EINVAL;
            rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
          of_node_put(rmem_np);
-        if (!rmem) {
-            ret = -EINVAL;
-            goto unmap_rmem;
-        }
+        if (!rmem)
+            return -EINVAL;
            kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base;
          /*
@@ -1029,12 +1025,11 @@ static int k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
           */
          kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base;
          kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size;
-        kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(rmem->base, rmem->size);
+        kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rmem->base, rmem->size);
          if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) {
              dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n",
                  i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size);
-            ret = -ENOMEM;
-            goto unmap_rmem;
+            return -ENOMEM;
          }
            dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
@@ -1045,19 +1040,6 @@ static int k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
      kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems;
        return 0;
-
-unmap_rmem:
-    for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
-        iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
-    return ret;
-}
-
-static void k3_r5_reserved_mem_exit(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
-{
-    int i;
-
-    for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++)
-        iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
  }
    /*
@@ -1285,10 +1267,8 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
          }
            ret = rproc_add(rproc);
-        if (ret) {
-            dev_err(dev, "rproc_add failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
-            goto err_add;
-        }
+        if (ret)
+            dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "rproc_add failed\n");

Did you mean to return the result of dev_err_probe() here? Without that


Thanks for catching this. Should return here. Will fix in v2.

Thanks,
Beleswar

now anything between here and where err_add used to be will get run.
Might be more clear that this is correct by still doing a "goto out;"

Andrew

            /* create only one rproc in lockstep, single-cpu or
           * single core mode
@@ -1333,8 +1313,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
    err_powerup:
      rproc_del(rproc);
-err_add:
-    k3_r5_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
  out:
      /* undo core0 upon any failures on core1 in split-mode */
      if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT && core == core1) {
@@ -1379,8 +1357,6 @@ static void k3_r5_cluster_rproc_exit(void *data)
          mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
            rproc_del(rproc);
-
-        k3_r5_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
      }
  }