Re: [PATCH] x86/static-call: fix 32-bit build

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Dec 18 2024 - 04:47:22 EST


On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 09:02:28AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In 32-bit x86 builds CONFIG_STATIC_CALL_INLINE isn't set, leading to
> static_call_initialized not being available.
>
> Define it as "0" in that case.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 0ef8047b737d ("x86/static-call: provide a way to do very early static-call updates")
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>

Works for me -- I seem to have missed those patches landing, and I'm
assuming this patch is going to go along with them others that introduce
the problem.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> include/linux/static_call.h | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/static_call.h b/include/linux/static_call.h
> index 785980af8972..78a77a4ae0ea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/static_call.h
> +++ b/include/linux/static_call.h
> @@ -138,7 +138,6 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL
> #include <asm/static_call.h>
>
> -extern int static_call_initialized;
> /*
> * Either @site or @tramp can be NULL.
> */
> @@ -161,6 +160,8 @@ extern void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func, bool
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE
>
> +extern int static_call_initialized;
> +
> extern int __init static_call_init(void);
>
> extern void static_call_force_reinit(void);
> @@ -226,6 +227,8 @@ extern long __static_call_return0(void);
>
> #elif defined(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL)
>
> +#define static_call_initialized 0
> +
> static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
>
> #define DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(name, _func) \
> @@ -282,6 +285,8 @@ extern long __static_call_return0(void);
>
> #else /* Generic implementation */
>
> +#define static_call_initialized 0
> +
> static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
>
> static inline long __static_call_return0(void)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>