Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: add ID for eMMC for EN7581

[Conor Dooley]

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 06:20:27PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 05:04:03PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:11:33AM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > Add ID for eMMC for EN7581. This is to control clock selection of eMMC
> > > between 200MHz and 150MHz.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changes v2:
> > > - Drop additional define for EN7581_NUM_CLOCKS
> > > 
> > >  include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h
> > > index 717d23a5e5ae..c4f8a161b981 100644
> > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h
> > > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> > >  #define EN7523_CLK_CRYPTO	6
> > >  #define EN7523_CLK_PCIE		7
> > >  
> > 
> > Why the gap?
> >
> 
> It's only present in en7523 so maybe it's a good idea to have the gap to
> make that more clear?
> 
> > > +#define EN7581_CLK_EMMC		8
> > > +
> > >  #define EN7523_NUM_CLOCKS	8
> > 
> > Can you delete this please? Your changelog appears to suggest you did,
> > but I see it still.
> 
> Yes sure didn't want to change this too much to cause regression
> downstream if anyone was using it. Will drop in a dedicated patch when I
> will post v3 tomorrow.


Oh, I'm dumb. I didn't notice 1 instead of 3, sorry.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature