Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: SVM: Handle vectoring error in check_emulate_instruction

[Sean Christopherson]

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, Ivan Orlov wrote:
> Detect unhandleable vectoring in check_emulate_instruction to prevent
> infinite loop on SVM and eliminate the difference in how intercepted #PF
> during vectoring is handled on SVM and VMX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <iorlov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V1 -> V2:
> - Detect the unhandleable vectoring error in svm_check_emulate_instruction
> instead of handling it in the common MMU code (which is specific for
> cached MMIO)
> V2 -> V3:
> - Use more generic function to check if emulation is allowed when
> vectoring
> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index dd15cc635655..e89c6fc2c4e6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -4802,6 +4802,12 @@ static int svm_check_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int emul_type,
>  	bool smep, smap, is_user;
>  	u64 error_code;
>  
> +	/* Check that emulation is possible during event vectoring */
> +	if ((to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->control.exit_int_info &
> +	    SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_MASK) &&

Let this poke out.  Alternatively, and probably preferably, capture "svm" locally
and it fits nicely on one line (there's an existing user of to_svm() in this
helper).  My objection to a local variable was specifically about a local
"is_event_vectoring", not about local variables in general.

> +	    !kvm_can_emulate_event_vectoring(emul_type))
> +		return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE_VECTORING;
> +
>  	/* Emulation is always possible when KVM has access to all guest state. */
>  	if (!sev_guest(vcpu->kvm))
>  		return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>