Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] blk-mq: issue warning when offlining hctx with online isolcpus

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 07:29:43PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> When we offlining a hardware context which also serves isolcpus mapped
> to it, any IO issued by the isolcpus will stall as there is nothing
> which handles the interrupts etc.
> 
> This configuration/setup is not supported at this point thus just issue
> a warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index de15c0c76f874a2a863b05a23e0f3dba20cb6488..f9af0f5dd6aac8da855777acf2ffc61128f15a74 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3619,6 +3619,45 @@ static bool blk_mq_hctx_has_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  	return data.has_rq;
>  }
>  
> +static void blk_mq_hctx_check_isolcpus_online(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned int cpu)

Please avoid the overly long line here.

> +{
> +	const struct cpumask *hk_mask;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ))
> +		return;
> +
> +	hk_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < hctx->nr_ctx; i++) {
> +		struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = hctx->ctxs[i];
> +
> +		if (ctx->cpu == cpu)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Check if this context has at least one online
> +		 * housekeeping CPU in this case the hardware context is
> +		 * usable.

But here you;re not even using up all 80 characters for the comment.