Re: [RFC net-next v02 1/3] net: hinic3: module initialization and tx/rx logic
From: Gur Stavi
Date: Thu Dec 19 2024 - 03:42:22 EST
> > +static void hinic3_del_one_adev(struct hinic3_hwdev *hwdev,
> > + enum hinic3_service_type svc_type)
> > +{
> > + struct hinic3_pcidev *pci_adapter = hwdev->adapter;
> > + struct hinic3_adev *hadev;
> > + bool timeout = true;
> > + unsigned long end;
> > +
> > + end = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HINIC3_EVENT_PROCESS_TIMEOUT);
> > + do {
> > + if (!test_and_set_bit(svc_type, &pci_adapter->state)) {
> > + timeout = false;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + usleep_range(900, 1000);
> > + } while (time_before(jiffies, end));
> > +
> > + if (timeout && !test_and_set_bit(svc_type, &pci_adapter->state))
> > + timeout = false;
>
> Please look at using iopoll.h
>
Ack
> > +static int hinic3_sw_init(struct net_device *netdev)
> > +{
> > + struct hinic3_nic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > + struct hinic3_hwdev *hwdev = nic_dev->hwdev;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + nic_dev->q_params.sq_depth = HINIC3_SQ_DEPTH;
> > + nic_dev->q_params.rq_depth = HINIC3_RQ_DEPTH;
> > +
> > + hinic3_try_to_enable_rss(netdev);
> > +
> > + eth_hw_addr_random(netdev);
>
> Is using a random MAC just a temporary thing until more code is added
> to access an OTP?
>
No, using a random MAC is not a temporary solution.
This device is designed for cloud environments. VFs are expected to be
used by VMs that may migrate from device to device. Therefore the HW does
not provide a MAC address to VFs, but rather the VF driver selects a
random MAC address and configures it into the (current) device.
Once the driver is extended to support PFs, the PF MAC will be obtained
from the device.
> > + err = register_netdev(netdev);
> > + if (err) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err_netdev;
> > + }
> > +
> > + netif_carrier_off(netdev);
> > +
> > + dev_set_drvdata(&adev->dev, nic_dev);
>
> Is this used anywhere in the driver? Calling register_netdev() makes
> the interface live, even before it returns. If you have NFS root for
> example, it could be sending packets, etc, before drvdata is set.
>
Ack
> > +int hinic3_set_port_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, u16 new_mtu)
> > +{
> > + struct hinic3_nic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > + struct hinic3_func_tbl_cfg func_tbl_cfg = {};
> > + struct hinic3_hwdev *hwdev = nic_dev->hwdev;
> > +
> > + if (new_mtu < HINIC3_MIN_MTU_SIZE) {
> > + dev_err(hwdev->dev,
> > + "Invalid mtu size: %ubytes, mtu size < %ubytes\n",
> > + new_mtu, HINIC3_MIN_MTU_SIZE);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (new_mtu > HINIC3_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE) {
> > + dev_err(hwdev->dev, "Invalid mtu size: %ubytes, mtu size > %ubytes\n",
> > + new_mtu, HINIC3_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> The core can do this validation for you, if you set ndev->max_mtu,
> ndev->min_mtu.
Ack