On 12/19/24 11:11, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:41:53AM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:You are right, I felt off-track.
On 12/18/24 10:02, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:Maybe I missed sth. The hclge_set_reset_pending() is added to check if
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 09:08:33AM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:I haven't signed-off this patch.
From: Hao Lan <lanhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
When a reset type that is not supported by the driver is input, a reset
pending flag bit of the HNAE3_NONE_RESET type is generated in
reset_pending. The driver does not have a mechanism to clear this type
of error. As a result, the driver considers that the reset is not
complete. This patch provides a mechanism to clear the
HNAE3_NONE_RESET flag and the parameter of
hnae3_ae_ops.set_default_reset_request is verified.
The error message:
hns3 0000:39:01.0: cmd failed -16
hns3 0000:39:01.0: hclge device re-init failed, VF is disabled!
hns3 0000:39:01.0: failed to reset VF stack
hns3 0000:39:01.0: failed to reset VF(4)
hns3 0000:39:01.0: prepare reset(2) wait done
hns3 0000:39:01.0 eth4: already uninitialized
Use the crash tool to view struct hclgevf_dev:
struct hclgevf_dev {
...
default_reset_request = 0x20,
reset_level = HNAE3_NONE_RESET,
reset_pending = 0x100,
reset_type = HNAE3_NONE_RESET,
...
};
Fixes: 720bd5837e37 ("net: hns3: add set_default_reset_request in the hnae3_ae_ops")
Signed-off-by: Hao Lan <lanhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Still no need to repost (yet) for this if the following points are
solved rapidly (as I may end-up merging the series and really adding my
SoB), but please avoid this kind of issue in the future.
@Michal: I don't understand your comment above. hclge_reset_err_handle()@@ -4227,7 +4240,7 @@ static bool hclge_reset_err_handle(struct hclge_dev *hdev)Sth is unclear for me here. Doesn't HNAE3_NONE_RESET mean that there is
return false;
} else if (hdev->rst_stats.reset_fail_cnt < MAX_RESET_FAIL_CNT) {
hdev->rst_stats.reset_fail_cnt++;
- set_bit(hdev->reset_type, &hdev->reset_pending);
+ hclge_set_reset_pending(hdev, hdev->reset_type);
no reset? If yes, why in this case reset_fail_cnt++ is increasing?
Maybe the check for NONE_RESET should be done in this else if check to
prevent reset_fail_cnt from increasing (and also solve the problem with
pending bit set)
handles attempted reset failures. I don't see it triggered when
reset_type == HNAE3_NONE_RESET.
reset type isn't HNAE3_NONE_RESET. If it is the set_bit isn't called. It
is the only place where hclge_set_reset_pending() is called with a
variable, so I assumed the fix is for this place.
This means that code can be reach here with HNAE3_NONE_RESET which is
unclear for me why to increment resets if rest_type in NONE. If it is
true that hclge_reset_err_handle() is never called with reset_type
HNAE3_NONE_RESET it shouldn't be needed to have the
hclge_set_reset_pending() function.
@Jijie: how can 'reset_type' be set to an unsupported value?!? I don't
see that in the code, short of a memory corruption on uninit problem.
Are you sure you are not papering over a different issue here? At least
some more info (either in the commit description or in a code comment)
is IMHO needed. Otherwise you should probably catch that before
hclge_reset_err_handle() time.