Re: [PATCH 14/20] KVM: selftests: Collect *all* dirty entries in each dirty_log_test iteration

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 12/19/24 03:13, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > While this patch might improve coverage for this particular case,
> > I think that this patch will make the test to be much more deterministic,
>
> The verification will be more deterministic, but the actual testcase itself is
> just as random as it was before.

Based on my recollection of designing this thing with Peter, I can 
"confirm" that there was no particular intention of making the 
verification more random.

> > and thus have less chance of catching various races in the kernel that can happen.
> >
> > In fact in my option I prefer moving this test in other direction by
> > verifying dirty ring while the *vCPU runs* as well, in other words, not
> > stopping the vCPU at all unless its dirty ring is full.
>
> But letting the vCPU-under-test keep changing the memory while it's being validated
> would add significant complexity, without any benefit insofar as I can see.  As
> evidenced by the bug the current approach can't detect, heavily stressing the
> system is meaningless if it's impossible to separate the signal from the noise.

Yes, I agree.

Paolo