Re: missing clear bdr in check_ram_in_range_map()?
From: Baochen Qiang
Date: Thu Dec 19 2024 - 22:25:40 EST
On 12/12/2024 3:14 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 06:50:06PM +0800, Baochen Qiang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> while checking check_ram_in_range_map() I am confused by the condition set/check on bdr.
>> If I am reading the code correctly, if bdr is set once, it would never get cleared, hence
>> that function will always returns 0.
>>
>> should we clear bdr before each new iteration?
>
> I think so. Even better refactor the code so that the non-NULL bdr
> doesn't leak out:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> index 5b4e6d3bf7bc..181e244f410a 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> @@ -584,6 +584,22 @@ int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> return mask >= phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, min_mask);
> }
>
> +static const struct bus_dma_region *dma_find_range(struct device *dev,
> + unsigned long start_pfn)
> +{
> + const struct bus_dma_region *m;
> +
> + for (m = dev->dma_range_map; PFN_DOWN(m->size); m++) {
> + unsigned long cpu_start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(m->cpu_start);
> +
> + if (start_pfn >= cpu_start_pfn &&
> + start_pfn - cpu_start_pfn < PFN_DOWN(m->size))
> + return m;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * To check whether all ram resource ranges are covered by dma range map
> * Returns 0 when further check is needed
> @@ -593,23 +609,14 @@ static int check_ram_in_range_map(unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long nr_pages, void *data)
> {
> unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
> - const struct bus_dma_region *bdr = NULL;
> - const struct bus_dma_region *m;
> struct device *dev = data;
>
> while (start_pfn < end_pfn) {
> - for (m = dev->dma_range_map; PFN_DOWN(m->size); m++) {
> - unsigned long cpu_start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(m->cpu_start);
> + const struct bus_dma_region *bdr;
>
> - if (start_pfn >= cpu_start_pfn &&
> - start_pfn - cpu_start_pfn < PFN_DOWN(m->size)) {
> - bdr = m;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> + bdr = dma_find_range(dev, start_pfn);
> if (!bdr)
> return 1;
> -
> start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(bdr->cpu_start) + PFN_DOWN(bdr->size);
> }
>
looks better. thanks for reply.