Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: extend description of size member of struct flash_info

[Miquel Raynal]

>> >> TBH I'd be perfectly fine (and prefer) a dedicated member, because
>> >> code clarity is IMO more important than memory footprint today.
>
> But that would have meant more code churn, because the default
> should be the new method. Thus we'd have to change all the old
> entries.

Oh yeah, I feel it would be a patchset on its own. I'm just mentioning
it if someone has the willingness some day. As for now, it is important
to properly document how we use the fields.