Re: [PATCH v2] seq_file: copy as much as possible to user buffer in seq_read()

[Markus Elfring]

> seq_read() yields at most seq_file->size bytes to userspace, …

                                                    user space?


…
> 	$ strace -T -e read cat /proc/interrupts  > /dev/null
…
> 	 45 read(3, "", 131072)                     = 0 <0.000010>
> On a system with hundreds of cpus, it would need …

                               CPUs?


Is it a bit nicer to separate test output and subsequent comments by blank lines?


…
> Fill up user buffer as much as possible in seq_read(), extra read
> calls can be avoided with a larger user buffer, and 2%~10% performance
> improvement would be observed:
Will it help to split such a paragraph into three sentences
(on separate lines)?

Regards,
Markus