Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: google: add gs101-raven and generic gs101-pixel
From: André Draszik
Date: Mon Dec 23 2024 - 02:45:40 EST
Hi Krzysztof,
On Sun, 2024-12-22 at 12:38 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/12/2024 12:27, André Draszik wrote:
> > Raven is Google's code name for Pixel 6 Pro. Since there are
> > differences compared to Pixel 6 (Oriole), we need to add a separate
> > compatible for it.
> >
> > We also want to support a generic DT, which can work on any type of
>
> There are no such generic DT devices upstream, so we cannot add bindings
> for them.
Do you have a better suggestion for the wording?
How about 'gs101-based Pixel base board'?
> > gs101-based Pixel device, e.g. Pixel 6, or Pixel 6 Pro, or Pixel 6a (as
> > a future addition). Such a DT will have certain nodes disabled / not
> > added. To facilitate such a generic gs101-based Pixel device, also add
> > a more generic gs101-pixel compatible. We can not just use the existing
> > google,gs101 for that, as it refers to the SoC, not a board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml
> > index e20b5c9b16bc..a8faf2256242 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/google.yaml
> > @@ -34,11 +34,21 @@ properties:
> > const: '/'
> > compatible:
> > oneOf:
> > - - description: Google Pixel 6 / Oriole
> > + - description: Google GS101 Pixel devices, as generic Pixel, or Pixel 6
> > + (Oriole), or 6 Pro (Raven)
> > + minItems: 2
> > + maxItems: 3
> > items:
> > - - enum:
> > - - google,gs101-oriole
> > - - const: google,gs101
> > + enum:
> > + - google,gs101-oriole
> > + - google,gs101-raven
> > + - google,gs101-pixel
> > + - google,gs101
>
> SoC cannot be a board in the same time.
Can you please expand? google,gs101 is the SoC, the other ones are boards.
Is the commit message unclear?
>
> > + allOf:
> > + - contains:
> > + const: google,gs101-pixel
> > + - contains:
> > + const: google,gs101
>
> This should be fixed list.
OK. (This was inspired by Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/xilinx/xilinx.yaml)
Cheers,
Andre'