Hello Chuyi,
On 12/16/2024 5:53 PM, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
[..snip..]
@@ -2081,6 +2081,12 @@ numa_type numa_classify(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
return node_fully_busy;
}
+static inline bool numa_migrate_test_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
+{
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr) &&
+ housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_DOMAIN);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
/* Forward declarations of select_idle_sibling helpers */
static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu);
@@ -2168,7 +2174,7 @@ static void task_numa_assign(struct task_numa_env *env,
/* Find alternative idle CPU. */
for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpumask_of_node(env->dst_nid), start + 1) {
Can we just do:
for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpumask_of_node(env->dst_nid), housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)) {
...
}
and avoid adding numa_migrate_test_cpu(). Thoughts?
if (cpu == env->best_cpu || !idle_cpu(cpu) ||
- !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, env->p->cpus_ptr)) {
+ !numa_migrate_test_cpu(env->p, cpu)) {
continue;
}
@@ -2480,7 +2486,7 @@ static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env,
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(env->dst_nid)) {
Same modifications can be made for this outer loop.