Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: add rk3562 cru bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 05:23:08PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> Document the device tree bindings of the rockchip rk3562 SoC
> clock and reset unit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18


s/rk3562/Rocchip RK3562/
or whatever your proper name is (and use proper capitalized parts of
products)

> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: rockchip,rk3562-cru
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  "#clock-cells":
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  "#reset-cells":
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 2


Why clocks are not required?

> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: xin24m
> +      - const: xin32k
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - "#clock-cells"
> +  - "#reset-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    clock-controller@ff100000 {
> +      compatible = "rockchip,rk3562-cru";
> +      reg = <0xff100000 0x40000>;
> +      #clock-cells = <1>;
> +      #reset-cells = <1>;

Why clocks are not here?

Best regards,
Krzysztof