Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] tpm: Map the ACPI provided event log
From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Fri Dec 27 2024 - 05:49:57 EST
On Fri Dec 27, 2024 at 10:43 AM EET, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 at 07:01, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The following failure was reported:
> >
> > [ 10.693310][ T1] tpm_tis STM0925:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x3, rev-id 0)
> > [ 10.848132][ T1] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 10.853559][ T1] WARNING: CPU: 59 PID: 1 at mm/page_alloc.c:4727 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x2ca/0x330
> > [ 10.862827][ T1] Modules linked in:
> > [ 10.866671][ T1] CPU: 59 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-lp155.2.g52785e2-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 588cd98293a7c9eba9013378d807364c088c9375
> > [ 10.882741][ T1] Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL320 Gen12/ProLiant DL320 Gen12, BIOS 1.20 10/28/2024
> > [ 10.892170][ T1] RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_noprof+0x2ca/0x330
> > [ 10.898103][ T1] Code: 24 08 e9 4a fe ff ff e8 34 36 fa ff e9 88 fe ff ff 83 fe 0a 0f 86 b3 fd ff ff 80 3d 01 e7 ce 01 00 75 09 c6 05 f8 e6 ce 01 01 <0f> 0b 45 31 ff e9 e5 fe ff ff f7 c2 00 00 08 00 75 42 89 d9 80 e1
> > [ 10.917750][ T1] RSP: 0000:ffffb7cf40077980 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > [ 10.923777][ T1] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000040cc0 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > [ 10.931727][ T1] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: 0000000000040cc0
> >
> > Above shows that ACPI pointed a 16 MiB buffer for the log events because
> > RSI maps to the 'order' parameter of __alloc_pages_noprof(). Address the
> > bug by mapping the region when needed instead of copying.
> >
> > Earlier fix does address the warning but wastes 16 MiB of memory. This
> > finalizes the fix.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Andy Liang <andy.liang@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Where are patch 1/2 and the cover letter?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20241227060053.174314-1-jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#mc34835f6d6f946c50a580f895f24b7b1dab85204
You did not request a cover letter, and I did not think it was
really necessary. I can do it for next version on request.
BR, Jarkko