Re: [PATCH 10/14] nvme-tcp: switch nvme_tcp_set_queue_io_cpu() to using cpumask_next_wrap()

[Sagi Grimberg]

On 28/12/2024 20:49, Yury Norov wrote:
> Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU == -1 effectively
> is the same as request to find next CPU, wrapping around if needed.
>
> cpumask_next_wrap() is the proper replacement for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> index 054904376c3c..088101c57f53 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> @@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ static void nvme_tcp_set_queue_io_cpu(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue)
>   	if (wq_unbound)
>   		queue->io_cpu = WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
>   	else
> -		queue->io_cpu = cpumask_next_wrap_old(n - 1, cpu_online_mask, -1, false);
> +		queue->io_cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(n - 1, cpu_online_mask);
>   }
>   
>   static void nvme_tcp_tls_done(void *data, int status, key_serial_t pskid)

Acked-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Note that this will conflict with another outstanding patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20241224120457.576100-1-sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u