Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] thermal: qcom: Add support for MBG thermal monitoring
From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Mon Dec 30 2024 - 09:06:45 EST
On 30.12.2024 10:45 AM, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>
> On 12/13/2024 9:18 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 12.12.2024 5:11 PM, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>>> Add driver for the MBG thermal monitoring device. It monitors
>>> the die temperature, and when there is a level 1 upper threshold
>>> violation, it receives an interrupt over spmi. The driver reads
>>> the fault status register and notifies thermal accordingly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>> [...]
>>
>>> +static const struct mbg_map_table map_table[] = {
>> Is this peripheral/pmic-specific?
>
>
> Yes, peripheral specific.
Okay, I asked a question that I don't recall what I meant by.
To be clear, is this table specific to all instances of MBG on
different kinds of PMIC7, or does it only apply to PM8775
specifically?
>
>>> + /* minT vtemp0 tc */
>>> + { -60000, 4337, 1967 },
>>> + { -40000, 4731, 1964 },
>>> + { -20000, 5124, 1957 },
>>> + { 0, 5515, 1949 },
>>> + { 20000, 5905, 1940 },
>>> + { 40000, 6293, 1930 },
>>> + { 60000, 6679, 1921 },
>>> + { 80000, 7064, 1910 },
>>> + { 100000, 7446, 1896 },
>>> + { 120000, 7825, 1878 },
>>> + { 140000, 8201, 1859 },
>>> +};
Konrad