[PATCH 10/12] x86,tlb: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code

[Rik van Riel]

Instead of doing a system-wide TLB flush from arch_tlbbatch_flush,
queue up asynchronous, targeted flushes from arch_tlbbatch_add_pending.

This also allows us to avoid adding the CPUs of processes using broadcast
flushing to the batch->cpumask, and will hopefully further reduce TLB
flushing from the reclaim and compaction paths.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 12 +++------
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c               | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
index 1ad56eb3e8a8..f9a17edf63ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch {
 	 * the PFNs being flushed..
 	 */
 	struct cpumask cpumask;
+	bool used_invlpgb;
 };
 
 #endif /* _ARCH_X86_TLBBATCH_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 5e9956af98d1..17ec1b169ebd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -297,21 +297,15 @@ static inline u64 inc_mm_tlb_gen(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	return atomic64_inc_return(&mm->context.tlb_gen);
 }
 
-static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
-					     struct mm_struct *mm,
-					     unsigned long uaddr)
-{
-	inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
-	cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
-	mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
-}
-
 static inline void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	flush_tlb_mm(mm);
 }
 
 extern void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch);
+extern void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
+					     struct mm_struct *mm,
+					     unsigned long uaddr);
 
 static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags,
 					unsigned long newflags,
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index eb83391385ce..454a370494d3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -1602,16 +1602,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__flush_tlb_all);
 void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 {
 	struct flush_tlb_info *info;
-	int cpu;
-
-	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB)) {
-		guard(preempt)();
-		invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals();
-		tlbsync();
-		return;
-	}
-
-	cpu = get_cpu();
+	int cpu = get_cpu();
 
 	info = get_flush_tlb_info(NULL, 0, TLB_FLUSH_ALL, 0, false,
 				  TLB_GENERATION_INVALID);
@@ -1629,12 +1620,49 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 		local_irq_enable();
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * If we issued (asynchronous) INVLPGB flushes, wait for them here.
+	 * The cpumask above contains only CPUs that were running tasks
+	 * not using broadcast TLB flushing.
+	 */
+	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB) && batch->used_invlpgb) {
+		tlbsync();
+		migrate_enable();
+		batch->used_invlpgb = false;
+	}
+
 	cpumask_clear(&batch->cpumask);
 
 	put_flush_tlb_info();
 	put_cpu();
 }
 
+void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
+					     struct mm_struct *mm,
+					     unsigned long uaddr)
+{
+	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB) && mm_broadcast_asid(mm)) {
+		u16 asid = mm_broadcast_asid(mm);
+		/*
+		 * Queue up an asynchronous invalidation. The corresponding
+		 * TLBSYNC is done in arch_tlbbatch_flush(), and must be done
+		 * on the same CPU.
+		 */
+		if (!batch->used_invlpgb) {
+			batch->used_invlpgb = true;
+			migrate_disable();
+		}
+		invlpgb_flush_user_nr(kern_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, 0);
+		/* Do any CPUs supporting INVLPGB need PTI? */
+		if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
+			invlpgb_flush_user_nr(user_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, 0);
+	} else {
+		inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm);
+		cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm));
+	}
+	mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL);
+}
+
 /*
  * Blindly accessing user memory from NMI context can be dangerous
  * if we're in the middle of switching the current user task or
-- 
2.47.1